Sunday, May 16, 2010

The Universe in a Nutshell 3.14159265358979323846264338327950...

Black holes are very mysterious things that we have pondered for many years. Why do black holes exist? Are there wormholes within black holes? What role do black holes play in the universe? All of these questions may or may not have answers, but nonetheless I will cover these topics with the help of Dr. Hawking and his book, The Universe in a Nutshell.

First of all, how come black holes exist? The most accepted theory is that a black hole occurs when a star of a very large size collapses (we consider some stars small even though most of these stars are much larger than our Earth.). A star constantly bonds atoms together in a process called fusion, which creates heat and light. Eventually, the star will no longer have enough energy to fuse any more atoms, so the star collapses. Because fusion creates heavier elements, the density of the star has increased. The star proceeds to collapse in on itself because of its own gravity. The gravity compacts the star into a very dense and heavy mass. This mass creates a gravity that is so powerful, that not even light can escape it! That is why a black hole is seen as black.

The black hole continues to pull in more and more mass, forever increasing its gravity. As the gravity increases, the black hole compacts more and more, making it denser and smaller. At what point does this process end? If it continues to get smaller, does it eventually disappear? I think that this can't be possible. According to the law of conservation of matter, matter cannot be created or destroyed. So, where does all that mass go?

I think that it only ends when the universe does. In other words, the black hole will get more and more dense forever finally the universe ends. Think for a moment. If the gravity is continually increasing, then eventually won't everything be sucked into the black hole? It is very possible that this is the case, that the gravity will become so great, that black holes will suck the universe back in on itself. If that happens, then all existence would be inside the center of a black hole. This would create such high temperatures that atoms would have all become a soup of quarks and gluons, which is what the beginning of the universe was like!

This leads to many more ideas. Perhaps our universe has had multiple existences. Each time, the universe was sucked back into its previous state until something set it off again. What sets off the universe we do not know, and perhaps we never will. However, this still leads to more questions. Are we the first big bang, the twentieth, the millionth? Why did the first one start? Where did our universe come from? Did it one day just appear? I guess there are still so many questions that we simply can't answer.

How about this one? What was the state of our universe at the beginning. Did it have time? According to the general theory of relativity, gravity slows down time! In my opinion, it makes sense for the beginning of the universe to have a slower time. If the universe was having a very slow time, then millions of years to us would be a few seconds to them. In other words, every few seconds in this miniature universe, large universes are being born and destroyed. This works in that once the universe ends, it will once again begin in a few seconds. That means if there is some sort of reaction that takes a long time to work, it really will not take that long in the universe.

I know that it sounds very confusing, but it means that almost as soon as the universe crunches into the infinitely small particle during an event known as the big crunch, it will expand once again. There is a counterpoint to this theory. If the gravity is so great, how can the universe possibly expand? It would just be crunched into the infinitely small universe forever! I am not sure how to answer that. I have just recently made all of these connections (five minutes ago...).

If this is indeed what black holes will do, then they play a much bigger role in the universe than we have ever thought possible. Dr. Hawking is an optimist, and thinks the universe will expand forever. I can't say that I totally agree with him. These connections I have made are based on facts, but involve a lot of thought as well, and I hope whoever may read this will take a little time to think about if this indeed is how our universe ends: by black hole?

Think about this. There is a good chance that there is a super-massive black hole in the middle of our galaxy, the Milky Way. There may be black holes at the center of every galaxy. Eventually, the black hole may swallow the entire galaxy, picking up mass and gravity! Then, black holes may start to merge to form even larger black holes. Then the universe would enter a phase of only black holes merging until they make the ultimate black hole. This ultimate black hole will suck in the rest of the universe until it compacts into something very much like the beginning of our universe!

Perhaps this is the correct theory. It may also be totally wrong. Either way, it is my current theory of the end of our universe: the ultimate black hole.

9 comments:

  1. I agree that the only conceivable end of a black hole is it sucking everything in, but it doesn't make sense how the matter would expand back out again unless there was another black hole with higher gravity sucking the stuff back out. And also, how do we even know black holes exist?

    ReplyDelete
  2. We know black holes exist because the theory of general relativity predicts that it should be that way. We have found areas in the sky that appear to be black, but a large amount of radiation comes from that area! Also, we have seen the effects they have had on nearby objects.

    I am not sure why the black hole would stop sucking everything in, or if it would be possible for it to do so. It is impossible to predict what happens at the singularity of a black hole using the general theory of relativity, just like it is impossible to predict what happened before the big bang. I am really not sure what would happen, and nobody else in the world is either.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am not sure if the uiverse will collapse into a black hole but if it did, I have a theory of what sets off the big Bang. If you have a peice of material that gains an excessive amount of energy it will catch on fire, explode or do something else really cool. Therefore I theorize that if the intire universe sets sucked into one spot, there would probably be enough energy to forcefully fragment. that would be the big bang. For that reason, the universe might not have to completely squish together before it blows up!!!!!!
    Supporting Dorothea, I believe in multiple universes so even if our universe, or someone largers' atom were to collapse, and we were completely encapsulated in other atoms/universes it would spherically pull apart ours until we spreadout and our universe would cease to exist but join the other surrounding universes. Fractile geometry again would mean that the universes are similar to galaxys in 1 universe and have big bangs and crunches.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shannon- Our universe can't join someone else's. We and everything on our planets just don't have the extra dimensions to fit in another universe. We're mostly physically incompatible, like Windows ME trying to play on Vista or vice versa. We would show up as 2-D, or a sensory overload, or something. Perhaps that's what ancient civilizations perceived as deities, beings from other universes with extra dimensions? Even if multiple universes do exist, things can't go from one to another, at least not without serious consequences. We're just not designed that way, and nothing from our universe is designed that way either.
    Also, Shannon, if the whole universe got smooshed into one spot, of course there would be immense pressure, but, because of the high density, the gravity would make it impossible for anything to leave, i.e., blow up.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dorothea, you are assuming that other universes have other dimensions. You do not know that for sure. We could be the same number of dimensions! I see your point, but keep all of the options open.

    Shannon is talking more about Fractal geometry. If you don't know what a fractal is, I would suggest searching it on Google. I do not believe our universe is a fractal, and I have my reasons to say that. One is that our universe should have a edge. At that edge, there is probably nothing. Also, atoms do not expand. Therefore, our universe is most likely not an atom of some unbelievably large being.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ok...what I never manage to understand is...in what does the universe exist when it is this compact thing? What is in the surrounding space? It has to exist "in" something, right?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Not necessarily. The universe is thought to have an edge, in which it is surrounded by literally nothing. However, we do not have a way to prove that. The universe could be never-ending, but I can't give you a for certain answer to that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What is the edge of the universe? And there can't just be nothing, can it? Is nothingness the same thing as a vacuum?

    ReplyDelete
  9. No, it is not. Nothing means not even space would exist. Neither would time. Vacuum is at least space, but nothing means absolutely nothing! No time, no space, no matter, no forces. I do not know what the edge of the universe is. It could be a singularity, which is a point where all laws of general relativity break down. It could just suddenly stop. Or, there could be no edge at all.

    ReplyDelete